![convention on biodiversity endnote citation convention on biodiversity endnote citation](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/biodiversitylawandpolicy-131007011737-phpapp01/95/biodiversity-law-and-policy-15-638.jpg)
Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Martins IS (2012) Global biodiversity change: The bad, the good, and the unknown.
#Convention on biodiversity endnote citation full
Mihoub JB, Henle K, Titeux N, Brotons L, Brummitt NA, Schmeller DS (2017) Setting temporal baselines for biodiversity: The limits of available monitoring data for capturing the full impact of anthropogenic pressures. Liu WJ, Xu J, Geng YJ, Tian Y, Yin SL (2018) Progress in negotiations on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and suggestions for Chinese government. Liu HO, Zhang FC, Zhao FW, Du LS, Xue DY (2020) Biodiversity sensitive issues from changes in the strategic objectives of the financial mechanism for the Convention on Biological Diversity. IPBES (2019) Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Geng YJ, Tian Y, Li JS, Xu J (2020) Progress and prospects of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
![convention on biodiversity endnote citation convention on biodiversity endnote citation](https://envirocivil.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/biodiversity.jpg)
(accessed on )Ĭhai QM, Fu S, Qi Y, Fan X (2020) Evaluation on the Paris Agreement work program and prospects for global climate governance. (accessed on )ĬBD (2020c) Options to Enhance Planning, Reporting, and Review Mechanism with a View to Strengthening the Implementation of the Convention. ( accessed on )ĬBD (2020b) Recommendations adopted by the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. (accessed on )ĬBD (2020a) Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on Its Second Meeting.
![convention on biodiversity endnote citation convention on biodiversity endnote citation](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/conventiononbiodiversity-170511162521/95/convention-on-biodiversity-cbd-9-638.jpg)
Environmental Conservation, 47, 15-21.īowles-Newark NJ, Chenery A, Misrachi M, Despot-Belmonte K (2015) Barriers to the Use of Global Indicators and Datasets to Support NBSAP Implementation and National Reporting Processes. Meanwhile, information to be reviewed shall also be comprehensive and balanced, while it is also suggested to consider the global stock-take mechanism to support efforts by parties to close the implementation gaps and to enhance actions and ambitions.īhatt R, Gill MJ, Hamilton H, Han XM, Linden HM, Young BE (2020) Uneven use of biodiversity indicators in 5th National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity. On the technical side, it is suggested to further enhance national information reporting to be reviewed and to encourage wide participation of parties in facilitative reviews of implementation, complementing those assessment efforts made by party themselves. Recommendations: Our strategic recommendations include strengthening the review mechanism in the light of a comprehensive and balanced advancement of the entire Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, enabled by high-level political support, as well as by the mobilization of willingness and actions from all stakeholders, meanwhile providing necessary flexibility to developing country parties. The paper further discusses and recommends strategic and technical steps to enhance the review mechanism of the Convention, in order to inform the implementation of the Convention, future development of the Convention and related research works. Purpose: This paper recaps the implementation mechanism of the Convention and outlines the major processes and contents of the review mechanism, followed by analysis of key obstacles.
![convention on biodiversity endnote citation convention on biodiversity endnote citation](https://image.slideserve.com/1106217/slide1-n.jpg)
The review mechanism is a crucial agenda item with wide attention of the international community, and a multi-dimensional system has been preliminarily established to support the review of the implementation of the Convention, its protocols and other legal documents.Ĭhallenges: However, the review mechanism has been confronted by the lack of political wills of participation with enhanced accountability, insufficient national inputs, ineffectiveness of review results to enhance implementation, as well as lack of coordination among a proliferation of review tools, all of which constrain the completeness and effectiveness of the review. Background: The loss of global biological diversity represents a global common concern and a major challenge, while it is urgently needed to strengthen the global biodiversity governance and the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity.